Six Questions for Euan, Founder/Editor, Structo Magazine

Structo publishes fiction up to 3,000 words and poetry in all genres, alongside essays and interviews with authors and others. Read the complete guidelines here.


SQF: Why did you start this magazine?

Euan: I worked on a film journal throughout my time at university and after graduation I realised that I missed the experience of working on a magazine. Literature had always been very important to me, and starting a literary magazine seemed like the perfect way to merge those two interests. Nine years and 17 issues of Structo later, I'm pretty sure I was right.


SQF: What are the top three things you look for in a submission and why?

Euan: The first and most important thing is that it compels us to continue reading. This can be accomplished in many ways—a well-drawn character, sparky dialogue, an intriguing question or statement dropped in the first few paragraphs—but every piece we publish has something of the sort. On the poetry front, verse should have a flow, unless halting text is necessary to communicate meaning. Finally, an interesting or unusual viewpoint is always welcome, be it that of the writer themselves or of the narrative or poetic voice.


SQF: What most often turns you off to a submission?

Euan: Overly elaborate prose or verse. Thesaurus writing gets very old, very quickly. It's also very hard to keep an open mind in the face of more than a couple of spelling mistakes on the first page.


SQF: What magazines/zines do you read on a “regular” basis?

Euan: On the literary magazine front: Popshot, Firewords Quarterly, The New Yorker and Barrelhouse. Also a shout-out to our fellow Nederlanders Versal, who will be coming back into print later this year after a few years away from publishing.


SQF: Based on your experience as an editor, what have you learned about writing?

Euan: That it's relatively easy to write a competent story, and that competent, soulless stories are the worst.


SQF: What one question on this topic do you wish I'd asked that I didn't? And how would you answer it?

Euan: The first question, on why I started the magazine, is an interesting one, but I think even more interesting would be: why do you continue to publish the magazine? Working for a literary magazine on a voluntary basis can be rather thankless at times, as after the excitement of the first few issues comes the realisation that most of an editor's job is administration. It takes something more to keep the issues coming, and for me it's working with other people, both the writers I interact with day-by-day and the team that has grown up around Structo and Structo Press.

Thank you, Euan. We all appreciate you taking time from your busy schedule to participate in this project.

Six Questions for Jo Simmonds, Editor, The Fiction Pool

The Fiction Pool publishes flash fiction to 1,000 words, short stories to 2,500 words, and poetry to one page.

(Ceased publication)

SQF: Why did you start this magazine?

Jo Simmonds: I worked as a volunteer reader for PANK magazine a couple of years ago and really enjoyed it. I wanted to see if I could start a quirky rebellious online magazine which had a mainstream atmosphere.

As a writer seeking publication in literary journals I also wanted to find out what it is like from the other side of the desk as an editor. There's no substitute for first hand experience in my view and I learnt a great deal from the first moment I began publishing.


SQF: What are the top three things you look for in a submission and why?

JS:

• A great first sentence with a good hook.
• 
  
• Different in some way to stand out next to other journals online.
• 
  
• Well written and edited. If it's ready to go it will save me time.

SQF: What most often turns you off to a submission?

JS:

• A bad covering email - my name has been misspelt or no biography has been included. Only in truly exceptional circumstances will I look past that.
• 
  
• Any of my guidelines being flouted.
• 
  
• Poorly written or edited stories or poetry.
• 
  
• People not even looking at one story on the site to research before submitting. I can tell!
• 
  
• If I have just published a flash featuring a lonely girl in a bad relationship I may not want to publish another one for a while. 
• 
  
• If you don't do social media I won't reject on this basis but it may be a deal breaker if I'm not sure about your submission. 

SQF: Do you provide comments when you reject a submission?

JS: No. I send a regulation email which is the same in all cases bar those submissions I consider to be exceptional but misplaced.


SQF: What magazines/zines do you read on a “regular” basis?

JS: Mslexia, The Lonely Crowd, Structo, PANK magazine, and The Incubator amongst others. Although I work part-time and I'm volunteer editor on this magazine so my reading time has been reduced.


SQF: What one question on this topic do you wish I'd asked that I didn't? And how would you answer it?

JS: I wish you had asked me what advice I would give to writers. I wish I had said be determined and never give up if you are getting the slightest hint of success. And most of all, I wish I could take my own advice!

Thank you, Jo. We all appreciate you taking time from your busy schedule to participate in this project.

Six Questions for Sara Roberts , Editor, Cafe Aphra

Cafe Aphra publishes poetry to 25 lines and flash fiction to 500 words. 

(ceased publication)

SQF: Why did you start this magazine?

Sara Roberts: We set up Cafe Aphra together with a small group of writing friends back in Autumn 2012. We had met through a short writing course organised by the Arvon Foundation at a wonderful place called Moniack Mhor up in the Scottish Highlands. We all felt somewhat frustrated by our unsuccessful attempts to submit work to many of the established literary journals, both in print and online, and we knew that there were a lot of great aspiring writers out there working in isolation and getting discouraged. So we decided to set up an online platform for writers to share their work and support and encourage each other, offering feedback and getting their work read by other people. It was about helping ourselves and each other through showcasing our writing, and encouraging writers to be collaborative and supportive, rather than competitive.


SQF: What are the top three things you look for in a submission and why?

SR: 

• Writing that moves me in some way emotionally. It may make me laugh, smile, feel sad, nostalgic, horrified, or whatever - it's not so much about which emotion or emotions, but it must move me in some way.
• Writing that is in some way true. That makes me nod or smile wryly in recognition. That contains an essence of human truth.
• Writing that makes me see something familiar in a completely new way.

SQF: What most often turns you off to a submission?

SR:

• Ranting (political, social, moral, spiritual or other). 
• Poor grammar or spelling; blatant typos that have been overlooked. Incorrect use of apostrophes, etc. 
• A story or piece of prose or verse that does not make any kind of sense, that is just a string of words for the sake of it, that hasn't really been thought about carefully. That hasn't been honed or polished or crafted. 
• In terms of flash fiction, above all else the character or characters have to be strong, have to feel real, have to convince me of their existence beyond the page. 
• In terms of verse, I personally find rhyming poetry can often feel twee and too easy or simplistic. I think it's very hard, actually, to write really good rhyming poetry today. So I would say that I have a definite preference for verse that does not follow an obvious rhyme scheme, but that's just me.

SQF: Do you provide comments when you reject a submission?

SR: Sometimes. Not often. Generally we only offer feedback if we feel that it was a strong submission that was nearly there and is worth taking the time to comment on, perhaps so that the author can re-work it and re-submit.


SQF: What magazines/zines do you read on a ‘regular’ basis?

SR: Gosh. That's a hard question! There are lots of them, but it depends what you mean by "on a regular basis"! Here are some literary journals and anthologies or publishing houses that I tend to go for when I can, in no particular order (some of them very big, some very small):

Glimmertrain Press, (previously) NanoFiction, Room, Granta, Tin House, The Fiction Desk, Aesthetica Magazine, Momaya Press, Brittle Star Magazine, Fish Publishing, Structo, The Sandspout, SickLit, Litro, Ad Hoc Fiction, Red Hen Press, East Coast Literary Review, Corvus review, From the Depths, Ink in Thirds, Haque Magazine, FlashFlood NFFD journal/anthology.

(And I'm sure I've forgotten at least half a dozen of really obvious ones.)


SQF: What one question on this topic do you wish I'd asked that I didn't? And how would you answer it?

SR: What are the things that annoy you the most when contributors submit work for the first time?

• People not writing a proper email, e.g. Hi Cafe Aphra / Dear Editor (or something to that effect), Please find attached my flash fiction submission entitled X. Thanks for your time. Best, Joe Bloggs. A surprising number of people just copy and paste the text of their submission straight into an email without any kind of explanation whatsoever, even to say whether it is a poetry or prose submission (and believe me, sometimes it is not obvious!). That always riles me because it just seems so lazy and as if the person submitting is not even acknowledging that there is a human being on the receiving end of their email.

• People who don't read the submission guidelines and send in short stories, say, of 2000 words without first checking what we actually post up on the website (which is flash fiction up to 500 words or poetry of up to 25 lines max). Please do check at least the last few posts to get a sense of what we publish before submitting.

SQF: Are you reading anyone else's blog about writing at the moment, and if so who?

SR: Yes, at the moment I find myself ready Emma Darwin's blog quite often, This Itch of Writing. I have read several of her articles and always found them to be really spot-on and sometimes quite brilliant. I would thoroughly recommend.

Thank you, Sara. We all appreciate you taking time from your busy schedule to participate in this project.